b'ratherartfullydeclinedtopassonit.Inap artialdissent CommissionerMoranpointedoutthatitisnowu nclear\'whether theCommissionwilladheretoitspriorpositionorwhetherit willadopttheviewoftheCircuitCourt.\' "ItwouldappearthattheAbbott-Sommerdecisionconstitutes atacitdeclarationbytheCommissionthatit mayonedaymakea freshattempttoconstrue29CPR1926 . S00(d)(1),butthatinthe interimjudgesmustchoosethe\'betterview\'astheyarepersuaded. "InthesecircumstancestheundersignedJudgewouldcasta resoundingvotefortheCircuitCourt rulethatsection1926.500 (d)(1)isinapplicabletoroofs.Notonlyhavewelongheldthis view,butwesharethecourt\'sconcernoverthemischiefofcontinuinglitigationresultingfromtheSecretary\'seffortstoapply 1926.S00(d) (1)toflatroofs.WeespeciallynoteJudgeBauer\'s observat{onthatifemployeesworkingonflatroofsrequirefal l ingprotectiontheSecretaryhasmachineryavailabletoamendthe regulationsandlaythemattertorest.TheAppellateCourt believedthetime,effortandexpensei nvolvedinamendingthe regulationswouldbefarlessthanthatexpendedintheLanger casealone.AhastycheckofCommissionr eportsrevealsthatthe confrontationbetweentheSecretaryandt heroofingindustryover 1926.S00(d) (1)alreadyinvolvesmorethantwodozenlitigatedcases. ShouldtheCommissioncontinuetosupporttheSecretary\'sefforts toapplysection1926.S00(d)(1)toroofs,itisafairassumption thatprotractedandexpensivelitigationwillcontinueinthe-variousappellatecircuits.ClearlyboththeSecretaryandthe roofingindustrywouldprofitfromasingleprocedureclarifying theroofingregulationsbyamendment ."(Footnotesomitted) OSHAhastherighttoappealJudgeWienman\'sdecisi ontotheReview Commission.Atthedateofthiswriting,suchappealhasnotbeenmade. Aninterestingfootnote- onthisparticularjob,ninetyper centof theworkinvolvedwasperformedattheveryedgeoftheroof,includingthe parapet;accordingly,therewasnosurfaceuponwhichtoplaceawarning linesystemwhichthecontractornormallyem TheOSHAcomp liance ployed. officer,followinghisinspection,suggestedinstallationofsafetylines. Thecontractordidinstallsafetylines,withtheresultthatoneoft he rooferstrippedoverthesafetylineandsufferedaburn,theon l yaccidentwhichhappenedonthejob. MAGNUSON-MOSSWARRANTYACT In1974,CongressenactedtheMagnuson-MossWarrantyAct,whichimpose s certaindutiesonpersonsgivingwrittenwarrantiescoveringconsumerpr oducts."Consumerproducts"aredefinedas"anytangiblepersonalproperty whichisdistributedincommercea ndwhichisnorm llyusedforpersonal, afamily,orhouseholdpurposes(includinganysuchpropertyintendedt ob e attachedtoorinstalledinanyrealpropertywithoutregardtowhe t heri t issoattachedorinstalled)."'